cheating forgery law legal cases Secrets
cheating forgery law legal cases Secrets
Blog Article
“There is no ocular evidence to show that Muhammad Abbas was murdered by any of your present petitioners. Mere fact that Noor Muhammad and Muhammad Din noticed firstly the deceased and after a long way they saw the petitioners going towards the same direction, did not signify that the petitioners were chasing the deceased or were accompanying him. These evidence cannot be treated as evidence of past found.
The mentioned case laws offer insights into how the courts interpret and use Section 302, emphasizing the importance of the fair and just legal system. It really is crucial for society to understand the gravity of this offense along with the need for stringent punishment to discourage possible offenders and be certain justice for the victims and their households.
These lists are sorted chronologically by Chief Justice and include all notable cases decided via the court. Articles exist for almost all cases.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-224033 Tag:Offered the legal analysis on the topic issue, we have been of your view that the claim with the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their First contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle is not legally seem, Moreover promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They are really subject matter to rules and regulations if the recruitment rules of the topic post allow the case on the petitioners for promotion could possibly be considered, however, we are very clear within our point of view that contractual service cannot be thought of for seniority and promotion as being the seniority is reckoned from the date of standard appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Health and fitness, topic to availability of vacancy topic on the approval on the competent authority.
ninety four . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It's perfectly-settled that the civil servants must first pursue internal appeals within 90 times. In the event the appeal is not really decided within that timeframe, he/she will then approach the service tribunal to challenge the initial order. Once they are doing so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, as being the 90 times to the department to act has already expired. Around the aforesaid proposition, we're guided by the decision on the Supreme Court during the case of Dr.
For your foregoing reasons the instant suit is dismissed with no order as to cost. Office to prepare decree in the above terms. Read more
Where there are several members of a court deciding a case, there may very well be 1 or more judgments presented (or reported). Only the reason with the decision of the majority can constitute a binding precedent, but all can be cited as persuasive, or their reasoning may be adopted in an argument.
There are numerous instances where death was never intended – even more where those nominated within the FIR were not present when the injury or death occurred. The death of the human being is actually a tragic event. Although the death of any living being is no less a tragic event.
The law as proven in previous court rulings; like common law, which springs from judicial decisions and tradition.
Please note, Should you be seeking a rate exemption from a single court and/or for non-research purposes, contact that court directly.
Using keywords effectively is likewise important. Look at using synonyms and variations of your keywords to ensure you seize all relevant results. Understanding the citation system used by Pakistani courts will also help you pinpoint specific cases.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا more info اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
A coalition of residents sent a letter of petition on the Supreme Court to challenge the Water and Power Improvement Authority’s (WAPDA) construction of the electricity grid station in their community, on designated “green belt” property. The Court heard the matter as a human rights case, as Article 184 (3) of your Pakistan Constitution provides authentic jurisdiction to your Supreme Court to consider up and determine any matter concerning the enforcement of fundamental rights of public importance.
The Roes accompanied the boy to his therapy sessions. When they were instructed in the boy’s past, they questioned if their children were Risk-free with him in their home. The therapist assured them that that they had practically nothing to worry about.